MIDDLE EASTERN WOMEN`S STATUS AND ROLES FROM PAST TO PRESENT

The study of Middle Eastern women has increased so rapidly in the past decades. The overviews of the topic are needed to introduce about what is known and what is the knowledge is based on the eastern women. There have been a variety of variations in women`s roles such as class, religion, period, ethnicity as for the features of women status, they are often attributed to some variations like Islam, education so women`s roles and status in education and work have expanded in many ways. In this essay, I will try to meet some of the features of Middle Eastern women by giving interpretations that take into account many features of the modern world. Also, I would like to elucidate the current state of writing on these women and to explain what has been accomplished in this field. In despite of most of the existing studies and surveys on the subject which are dealt with limited subjects, I would like to improve more on the subject. For instance, I will try to elucidate women`s strategies in the rise of fundamentalism in the Muslim World, the rise of Islam in the middle eastern societies and influence of women and gender relations, in addition, women`s activism and the rise of Islamism.
There is scarce information or documentation, until the fourteenth century, relevant to women from pre-Islamic terms. However, In the Middle East, the history of women has been studied for only approximately two decades. Even the extant documentation were written by views of elite men overwhelmingly before the third Islamic century, rather than direct substance about women such how women live and think of something.[1] Regarding the interpretation of the documentation, Believing Muslims have an approach to the Qur`an and the sayings of the Prophet Muhammad ( peace be upon him), known as traditions ( hadiths ). However, since the nineteenth century, modernizing Muslims had distinguished some fallibilities between the Qur`an and some traditions which said hostel for women also they were attributed to first Shi`i Imam, Ali. In addition these, this interpretations of the Qur`an have led to point out both Muslims and non-Muslims and the modern interpretation of the Qur`an were patriarchal considerably more than literal Qur`an text that is not contained the misogyny of the traditions ( hadiths ).[2] Moreover, Muslims who believe in equality of gender interpret the Qur`an by supporting equality despite male supremacist of some people because often to emphasize gender was dominant and still was among many conservative Muslims. Today the gender egalitarian programs and laws are accepted in the Muslim communities as an important mean along with not egalitarian views toward women. However, the negative sides of gender relations are exaggerated by some western scholars in the Muslim world[3].
The Islam occurred in the early seventh century and earliest writings regarding the position of women and attitudes of them were in the ninth century so these resources not only reflect the faults of the memory of society, but also society`s rapid change including a position of women. Moreover, in the later beliefs, the reading problem into earlier cases affects cultural practices because of this we should interpret women`s status and rules in the entire Middle East in light of cultural and socioeconomic case after the rise of Islam. In addition to these, there is a relative wealth of legal documents at the beginning about the fourteenth century especially with the Mamluks in Egypt and extensive Ottoman Empire and in these two empires, the sexual and social lives of women were freer than a literal reading of Islamic jurisprudence and writings and this is an important point regarding women.[4] After Islamic conquest, the roles of women in the Middle East modified to meet the circumstances of new Islamic states which reflect a variety of local ideas and circumstances after the seventh century.[5]
The roles of women, especially elite women, in the Middle East were to wear various forms of veiling and seclusion in the pre Islamic Middle East and men had proprietary rights over women and exclusive divorce rights even the specified rules on veiling[6] since the high-status women had to use veil but for other harlots and slaves women were forbidden because of their class and division even the large harems were found in various ancients Near Eastern Empires such as female slaves, concubines, and eunuchs. In the pre-Islamic Middle Eastern empires urban dwellers and nomads tended to be concerned about genealogical and family control over women`s sexuality for marriage. For instance, the marriage were one component of extended families, patriarchal, which men were more important than the marital relationship also there was less conflict between people as male control was strong on the female. On the other hand, there is a stress on female virginity in the Middle East and the northern Mediterranean as a center of male honor. Also, male honor not only included strength and hospitality, but also dominance on women and control their sexuality and these continued during centuries. Honor killing which is done by males in the natal family is a tribal custom but we cannot find it in the Islam and Qur`an, jurisprudence, but there is a belief which honor of men depended on women`s chastity and some belief were found elsewhere in Asia[7]
According to many scholars, Jewish and Christian had acquainted in an area with the rise of Islam in the Arabian towns like Mecca and Medina and in the revelations of the Qur`an, the women`s rights often are divided into two groups firstly, one sizable group of revelations which deal with equally and are enjoined to act regarding morality and modesty identically for both men and women. Secondly, there are some rules such as separate and unequal though generally less unequal practices. However, some revelations like dower (mahr) reformed pre Islamic tribal customs because all grooms had to give the “mahr” to marriage also in the Qur`an, the God said; “give their dower to your women as a free gift[8] also the male dower was seen as an indispensable payment. Some verses allow to men will have more than one wife, two, three or four, like an-Nisa surah third verse.[9] Nevertheless, the verses are commented by some interpreters and they say that polygamy was reformed by Qur`an on unlimited polygamy while some modern researchers say that there is a little evidence of unlimited polygamy.[10]
Some documents about women in the medieval Muslim societies were unearthed at the period of the first caliphate 661-749, Umayyads, but direct documents were drawn on reports from the period of the Abbasid caliphate 749-1258 that called the golden age of Islam in its early centuries but it was not a golden age for women or slaves. There are various forms of literature, biographical dictionaries and hadiths about women and some scholars were unearthing more material about them while the seclusion of women increased in the documentary record, Also women were excluded and secluded from the public life.[11]
At the time of the early Mecca and Medina Medieval Islamic society was more patriarchal but Islam did not begin as male supremacist of the Middle East religions by contrast with Jewish and Christian even Greek ideas since they have ideas of hostile to women. There is an influence on the inegalitarian status of women who came from conquered areas such as Sasanian and Byzantine empires. Dominant Islamic societies stressed to the inferior rationality of women and from their perspectives women were seen as evil threats to males and social order but modernists in recent centuries rejected these traditions and they want to reinterpret Qur`an in stark contrast we can see that some views of these genders still survive in the conservative views of the Traditions.[12]
The views of western on the Middle Eastern Muslim women were nuanced views and often emphasized condemnation of women. Also, hostility on the Muslims was based on threats at the time of the Muslim Middle East and Ottoman times. There was an attack through the polygamy, veiling, harems since Muhammed was supposed as sexual appetites but Muslim women were seeing as little more than slaves and Muslims were seen as intolerant in the perspective of Christians.
On the one hand, western women thought of that they had a higher position than Middle Eastern women regarding property ownership, legal cases and some possibility for divorce, and assumed that the sexual segregation was terrible oppression of women.[13] Sometimes westerns emphasized to Muslim societies which were based on ignorance of Muslim women. Muslims were praised and Western Christian practices were criticized by some women who knew turkey in the nineteenth century.[14] There are western negative stereotypes during the nineteenth century about the Muslim Middle East which is fallowing the Orientalism of Edward Said which inspires many useful studies.[15]
The negative attitudes toward the Middle Easterners were based on their religion but the changing position of women led to different roles as few girls attended modern schools even there was modern education at home with tutors and after this time women`s attitudes developed and were advocated scientific domesticity, home management even child rearing in Egypt and Istanbul. There were articles which are written to advocate, pros and cons, better condition for women even some women wanted to demand reforms in family law as well as education and work rights. There is stress about the seclusion of women as a justification by westerns, and by the late nineteenth century, women launched journals to advocate new women`s roles.[16]
The early decades of the period since 1950s women entered into a greater variety of industrial and professional jobs, in addition, the new spheres of employment were opened for women and the employment of women was partly based on economic reality. Moreover, conferences which may make women`s labor easier were influential in creating networks of activists like UN conference, Catholic Muslim alliance, and there were a variety of questions regarding women and sexuality developed in the conferences.[17] Western laws are found in the Middle Eastern laws such as abortion as illegal law but sexual harassment and marital rape were not punished and also maternity leave for women and equal pay and equal work were important steps. It is not doubted that local customs and family have more important significance than law since sometimes the customs are favorable to women with the existence of tribal population or groups which are more gender egalitarian. When patriarchal culture and after law which is done for women change, there were advances in women`s education and employment.[18] Because of no published women`s historical narratives, it is not easy to construct a narrative for Middle East women but there is an only basic question as the reform of Islamic Law and partial sources that cover the Middle East.[19] Moreover, I can see that there is increasing discussion regarding such problems as violence against women, extramarital sex, male and female sexuality even ignorance of many men and women regarding gender and sexuality in the memoirs and anthropological works[20] besides that in the 1960s the number of women and girls education increased and appointing to cabinet became easy, there was opening to the judiciary for women and there was an increase in the women`s literacy like male. In the 1970s we can see that after the huge demonstration of International Women`s Day enforced hijab was derailed, March 8, 1979, but women`s spheres declined with a gradual come back since 1990s especially in Iran in the Middle East. Although women in the Middle East had full political rights but women interested in politics less instead of this they trended to professions like medicine, law. On the other hand, some women gravitate more to politics like Tansu Ciller who became a woman prime minister in Turkey. The King of Saudi Arabia called for expanding the role of women in society in May 2003 and then there was a conference that included ten women for the first time, in addition, a special one day for women was devoted in Jiddah Economic Form[21] even the conference, Jiddah Economic Form, will be done soon, 15-16 April 2018, just one woman speaker will be there.[22]   
Conclusion
As in many cultures, women`s status and rules were legally subordinate to men`s status in many spheres. Though men`s status and rules had more rights, women had fewer rights also it was treated like minors for women. The idea of sexual segregation increased so rapidly in the past decades and it based on a patriarchal compulsion to control women sexuality and it shows the absence of any positive features in women`s lives. Although early period documentations were scarce, once documents available about it is not doubted a large number of women suffered and many numbers still suffer. The development of local practices regarding women was influenced by political and socioeconomic situations after the developed of Islamic law. Also, there are greater freedoms for women than envisaged in Islamic law but we can see in the contemporary researches that poor women had fewer rights than elite women. Although various historical reasons violence against women and limited women rights rise because of that some men and women combated in modern times.
On the other hand, although some women had freedoms, they were subjected to various sanctions for unauthorized behavior such sexual behavior because of this national structures have limited the emergence of egalitarian societies as economic political and social. There was a connection between unpopular autocracies and the measures to improve women`s freedoms since all made the job of women working with liberal men who do not stress women`s rights. Today a lot of women`s socioeconomic role in many jobs is more independent and powerful than before but popular class women have not been beneficial since there are harder lives and fewer economic roles and possibilities than before.[23] Finally because of the increased awareness of women`s rights and the significant increase in female education will be given the reason for hope.     

Bibliography;
1.      Afshar, Haleh, Women in the Middle East Perceptions, Realities and Struggles for Liberation, 2001
2.      Bayes, Jane, and Tohidi, Nayereh, Globalization, Gender and Religion; the Politics of Women`s Right in Catholic and Muslim Context, 2001.
3.      İbn Ebi’l-Hadîd, el-Hüseyin, Abdülhamid Hibetullah b. Muhammed b. (656/1258), Şerhu Nehci’l Belâğa, 1404/1983
4.      Joseph, Suad, Kandiyoti, Deniz, Gender and Citizenship in the Middle East, 2000.
5.      Keddie, Nikki R., Women in the Middle East Past and Present, 2007.
6.      Leila, Ahmed, Women and Gender in Islam; Historical Roots of a Modern Debate, 1992.
7.      Lockman, Zachary, Contending Visions of the Middle East; the History and Politics of Orientalism, 2004.
8.      Melman, Billie, Women`s Orients; English Women and the Middle East, 1995.
9.      Obermeyer, Carla Makhlouf, Family, Gender and Population in the Middle East Policies in Context, 1995.
1.  Roded, Ruth, Women in Islamic Biographical Collections; from Ibn Sa`d to Who`s Who, 1994.
1.  Rostam Kolayi, Jasmine, The Women`s Press, Modern Education and the State in Early Twentieth Century Iran 1900-1930s, 2000.
1.  Shaaban, Bouthania, Both Right and Left Handed; Arab Women Talk about Their Lives, 1991.
1.  Vieille, Paul, Iranian Women in Family Alliance and Sexual Politics in Women in the Muslim World, ed. Lois Beck and Nikki Keddie, 1990.
1.  Walther, Wiebke, Women in Islam, 1981.
1.  Ze`evi, Dror, Producing Desire; Changing Sexual Discourse in the Ottoman Middle East, 2006.
1.  Zuhur, Sherifa, Gender, Sexuality and the Criminal Laws in the Middle East and North Africa; A Comparative Study, Women for Women`s Human Rights, Istanbul, 2005.



[1] Nikki R. Keddie, Women in the Middle East Past and Present, Princeton University Press Princeton and Oxford, 2007, p.9
[2] İbn Ebi’l-Hadîd, Abdülhamid Hibetullah b. Muhammed b. el-Hüseyin (656/1258), Şerhu Nehci’l Belâğa, 1404/1983, p.105-106.
[3] Nikki R. Keddie, Women in the Middle East Past and Present, p.10.
[4] Ahmed Leila, Women and Gender in Islam; Historical Roots of a Modern Debate, New Haven: Yale University Press,1992, p.83.
[5] Carla Makhlouf Obermeyer, Family, Gender and Population in the Middle East Policies in Context, The American University in Cairo Press, 1995, p.74.
[6] Veiling means to cover the hair and much of the body.
[7] Haleh Afshar, Women in the Middle East Perceptions, Realities and Struggles for Liberation, Palgrave Macmillan Press, 2001, p.117.
[9] Ve in hıftum ellâ tuksitû fîl yetâmâ fenkihû mâ tâbe lekum minen nisâi mesnâ ve sulâse ve rubâa, fe in hıftum ellâ ta’dilû fe vâhideten ev mâ meleket eymânukum. Zâlike ednâ ellâ teûlû,
if you fear that you will not deal justly with the orphan girls, then marry that please you of other women, two or three or four. But if you fear that you will not be just, then marry only one or those your right hand possesses. That is more suitable that you may not incline”
[10] Wiebke Walther, Women in Islam, translated, C.S.V. Salt, Princeton; Markus Wiener, 1981, p.57.
[11] Ruth Roded, Women in Islamic Biographical Collections; from Ibn Sa`d to Who`s Who, Boulder, CO; Lynne Reinner, 1994, p.86.
[12] Nikki R. Keddie, Women in the Middle East Past and Present, p.31
[13] Dror Ze`evi, Producing Desire; Changing Sexual Discourse in the Ottoman Middle East,; University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles 2006, p.169 174.
[14] Billie Melman, Women`s Orients; English Women and the Middle East, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan press, 1995, p.106-7.
[15] Zachary Lockman, Contending Visions of the Middle East; the History and Politics of Orientalism, Cambridge University Press, 2004, chap. 6
[16] Jasmin Rostam Kolayi, The Women`s Press, Modern Education and the State in Early Twentieth Century Iran 1900-1930s, Ucla, 2000, p.189.
[17] Jane Bayes and Nayereh Tohidi, Globalization, Gender, and Religion; the Politics of Women`s Right in Catholic and Muslim Context, New York; Palgrave, 2001, p.8.
[18] Suad Joseph, Deniz Kandiyoti, Gender and Citizenship in the Middle East, Syracuse University Press, 2000, p.275.
[19] Sherifa zuhur, Gender, Sexuality and the Criminal Laws in the Middle East and North Africa; A Comparative Study, Women for Women`s Human Rights, new ways study, Istanbul, 2005,  p.68.
[20] Paul Vieille, Iranian Women in Family Alliance and Sexual Politics in Women in the Muslim World, ed. Lois Beck and Nikki Keddie, MA; Harward University Press, Cambridge, 1990, p.189.
[21] Nikki R. Keddie, Women in the Middle East Past and Present, p.151.
[23] Bouthania Shaaban, Both Right and Left Handed; Arab Women Talk about Their Lives, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1991

THE CONCEPTS OF RASUL AND NABI WITH TO THE WORD ‘PROPHET’ IN THE QUR’AN


The concepts of Rasul and Nabi are words to which people have tried to find meaning throughout history. When you take almost all of the verses of the Qur'an, these concepts can be found.[1] We can understand them better through the verses we find in the Qur’an. This is a concept[2] that is used everywhere, even if ‘Prophet’[3] is not a word in Arabic. There is a set of problems when we give the same meaning to the word ‘Prophet’ as Rasul and Nabi, and contradictions arise over the problem of meaning in the Qur’an. In this essay I will try to explain this problem and the concepts of Rasul and Nabi, and with examples and verses I will try to figure out the differences between Rasul and Nabi.
When we describe the concepts of Rasul and Nabi, we can say that all Nabis are Rasuls at the same time.[4] Allah gave the book to all Nabis, and they took the books, to serve notice on people. A Nabi becomes a Rasul by serving notice on people. The duty of Nabi is a title, and the duty of Rasul is a mission. For instance, we know that Muhammad[5] became a Nabi at 40 years old[6]. Although there is no mention of age in the Qur’an, Muhammad was Nabi, when the Qur'an began to be revealed to him, this title maintained until his death. We can say that for a Nabi he carried a lot of weight with regards to Allah, since he was an inspired person who was of raised value.[7]

The duty of Rasul is a mission, and we can compare this to the example of a diplomat and an ambassador.[8]Rasul also refers to the word ‘ambassador’. For instance, we call a diplomat ambassador of a state, and the word ‘diplomat’ is a title given by the state, whilst the ambassador is a mission. Therefore, Muhammad was a Nabi from 40 years old until his death, and he was a Rasul of Allah when he served notice of this revelation on people. What does this mean? The Qur'an commands obedience to the Rasul Muhammad,[9] and that people should not rebel against him.[10]Allah’s ordering and recommending is taken as an example of the Rasul Muhammad by the people.[11] There is no verse in the Qur’an that orders that a Nabi should be obeyed, but we cannot say that people can rebel against a Nabi, because there is no verse that says that you can disrespect him, since a Rasul is more valuable than a person’s own life,[12] and people must respect him.[13] There more than 30 verses in the Qur’an that command obedience to a Rasul, and obedience to a Rasul is found in the context of Allah and Rasul.[14] However, there are no verses about the context of Allah and Nabi anywhere. We can say that there is no coincidence in the words of Allah.[15]
Using the word ‘Prophet’ to abolish the words Rasul and Nabi is not correct. The word ‘Prophet’ does not have any meaning. Why? ’Prophet’ is an English word meaning a person who brings news, but Nabi does not mean the same thing. If Nabi comes from ن-ب-ا, the word ‘Nubuvvet’ word is not an infinitive.[16]Because of this, Nubuvvet comes from  ن-ب-وwhich means someone who is of great value, and the meaning of this word matches up to the same meaning in the Qur’an. This is a title, and we know that Nabi is a title which is selected for certain people in the Qur’an.[17]That's why en-nabi[18]means an extolled person,[19] and one of the valuable things given by Allah is revelation. The best example of this is the 6th verse of Al-Ahzab[20] in the Qur’an,[21]in which it is said that he is more valuable than the lives of believers,[22] even after the wives of Muhammad have taken a share of this.[23]
If the word ‘Prophet’ is used instead of the concepts of Rasul and Nabi, the meaning in the Qur'an cannot be fully understood, as it does not offer any response. We can even say that this creates contradictory statements in the Qur’an.[24] For this reason, especially when it is used alongside Rasul and Nabi, it is exactly as if the word ‘ambassador’ is used for both of them.[25] For example, Rasul is essentially a noun, whilst the others are adjectives in this verse.[26]The Rasul is a person who conveys the message of Allah, who preaches with revelation, and absolute obedience is required for the Rasul Muhammad. It is not possible to object to this, and this applies to all believers and even companions;[27]to do so is blasphemy, because this is in the verses of Allah. When we refer to Nabi, it is the Muhammed who is out of the duty. We can also say the mortal Muhammad, who lives his daily life, making comments and ruling on cases. This is the Nabi Muhammad, and whilst sometimes the ruling cases of Nabi is correct, there can be exceptions and because of the fact that Allah commands obedience to Rasul. If we take them to have the same meaning, we can see how the Qur’an has become an incomprehensible book. The purpose is to explain this with certain verses. I will now try to illustrate this through the companions using the concrete verses[28] which show that obedience is not necessary for Nabi. It is possible to say that there must be obedience to Nabi, but there have to be concrete verses.
The first example is companion Zeyd, who is also the only person mentioned by name in the Qur’an[29], and it is said that he was a person blessed by Allah.[30] We know that the blessing of Allah is faith,[31] and we have this blessing in every prayer.[32]The blessing in Islam is:‘This day have I perfected your religion for you, completed my favour upon you.’[33]Nabi Muhammad commanded Zeyd, saying,’Keep your wife, and fear Allah,’[34]but he failed to obey this order, and Muhammad married her. Zeyd did not obey Muhammad, and he was not punished by Allah, even that he was mentioned as a person upon whom Allah bestowed favour.[35] If Rasul Muhammad had commanded this precept, we could find verses about this, in which divorce is forbidden, but we understand that this is Nabi Muhammad. This verse is not to be taken as a literal order, but Muhammad said, ‘Keep your wife,’ as a piece of advice. In this case, the problem is not whether Muhammad was right, the problem is how to show that commands are not binding, except for the revelation, in the Qur’an. There is the story of Zihar,[36] in which one woman complains and argues with Muhammad.[37]Another example is in verses 5 and 6 of Al-Anfal, in which a group of mu’mins fighting with Muhammad recalcitrate to him,[38] but the same mu’mins are praised by Allah.[39]The wives of Muhammad, and the mothers of the mu’mins,[40]obey Rasul Muhammad absolutely, but sometimes they object to Nabi Muhammad.[41] Allah did not command obedience to Nabi, but it is said that people should not riot.[42]
It can be said that these verses above are about Nabi Muhammad. If these verses were to be ignored, we could not understand the differences between Rasul and Nabi, and could use the word ‘Prophet’ instead.
There is no doubt that following the Qur’an is the right way for believers, and there is no contradiction.[43] If we use the word ‘Prophet’ instead of the concepts of Rasul and Nabi in the meaning of the Qur’an, we can see some contradictions.[44]
The Prophet (Rasul) has the authority to forbid;[45]however, the Prophet (Nabi) does not have the authority to forbid, according to other verses.[46]Allah damns people who cause trouble for Allah and the Prophet (Rasul), and prepares a derogatory torment for them,[47]but the companions are hard on the Prophet (Nabi) in other verses.[48]If the Prophet (Rasul) sits in judgement of something, there is no choice, and if someone recalcitrates against this provision, this person deviates.[49]Zeyd recalcitrates the provision of the Prophet (Nabi), but he does not face the risk of deviation.[50] People who deputise for the Prophet (Rasul) but do not go along with him do not have faith,[51] but the woman who does not consent to the provision of the Prophet (Nabi) is not condemned by Allah.[52] If someone enters into a dispute with the Prophet (Rasul), this person will go to hell;[53] but companions who are in dispute with the Prophet (Nabi), on the contrary, attain paradise.[54] The disobedience of the wives of the Prophet (Rasul) is doubled,[55] but the wives of the Prophet (Nabi) are not threatened by Allah.[56]
We can understand that the Qur’an is not only a book that informs the provisions of Allah, but also the Sunnah of Rasul and the motion of Nabi. All of the verses mentioned above are verses which describe the mention of Nabi. The Qur’an is the book of Allah from the beginning until the end, and all of the verses within it were revealed to the Rasul Muhammad, and he served them upon his companions. The provisional verses correspond to ten percent of the book, and the remaining verses describe the life of Nabi, ruling on cases, making interpretations, and even addressing emotional cases. Therefore, the Qur'an means the words of Allah and the hadith of Rasul. For this reason, this is a Holy book, and having faith in the Qur’an is to go along with Rasul.[57] The best example is as follows: ‘Say, if you do love Allah, follow me. Allah will love you and forgive your sins; for Allah is oft-forgiving, most merciful.’[58]

       Bibliography
1.      Abdullah, Yusuf Ali, The Holy Qur’an, 2012
2.       al-Mehri, A.B., The Qurʼān : With Sūrah Introductions and Appendices-Saheeh International Translation, , 2010
3.      Armstrong, Karen, Muhammad a prophet for our time, New York, 1993.
4.      Asad, Mumammad, The Message of the Qur’an, 2000.
         Azzam, Leila and Gouverneur, Aisha, The life of the prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings of allah be upon him, 1999.
6.      Lings, Martin, Muhammad: His Life Based on the Earliest Sources, 2006.
7.      MaulawiSher’Ali, The Holy Qur’an, Arabic text and English translation, Holland, 2004
8.      Shano, Omar al Sulaiman, Siyer-iNebi (Arabic), 2017.
9.      Zaynu, Muhammad Jamil, Arkan al-Islam wa-al-Iman أركانالإسلاموالإيمان , Beirut, 1918.




[1]Al-An’am 83-89, Al-Ma’idah 44, Al-Nisa’105, Al-e-‘Imran 81…
[2]Prophet; This vocabulary doesnot correspond the consepts of rasul and nabi
[3] http://www.dictionary.com/browse/prophet
[4]Al-An’am 83-89, Al-Ma’idah 44, Al-e-‘Imran 81, Al-Nisa’105…
[5]SallallahuAleyhiveSellem
[6]Martin Lings, Muhammad: His Life Based on the Earliest Sources, p.51.
[7]Leila Azzam and AishaGouverneur, The life of the prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, p.14.
[8]Delegate’
[9]Al-Nisa’ 13-14-42-59-61-64-65-80, Al-e-‘Imran 31-32,  Al-Ma’idah 92, Al-A’raf 157-158, Al-Anfal 1-13-20-24.
[10]Al-Anfal 13-20, Al-Hujurat 1-3, Al-Mujadalah 5, Al-Taghabun 12.
[11]Al-Nur 51-52-63, Muhammad 32-33.
[12]Al-Ahzab 6.
[13]Al-Ahzab 56.
[14]Âl-e-‘İmrân 32-132, Al-Nisâ 13, Al-Anfâl1, Al-Nûr 52, Al-Taubah 71.
[15] Qur’an.
[16]Mastar in arabic dictionaries
[17]Karen Armstrong, Muhammad a prophet for our time, p.14.
[18]النبي
[19]Omar al Sulaiman Shano, Siyer-iNebi (Arabic),p.31.
[20] النَّبِيُّ أَوْلَى بِالْمُؤْمِنِينَ مِنْ أَنفُسِهِمْ
[21]A.B. al-Mehri, The Qurʼān : with Sūrah introductions and appendices : Saheeh international translation.
[22] Al-Ahzab 6
[23] Al-Ahzab 6
[24] The meaning of the Qur’an
[25]Al-Hajj 52,
[26]Al-A’raf 157
[27]صحبةجاصحاب
[28]Al-mujadalah 1, Al-Anfal 5-6, Al-Tahrim 1-5.
[29] Al-Ahzab37.
[30]أَنْعَمَاللَّهُعَلَيْهِوَأَنْعَمْتَعَلَيْهِ
[31]ايمان
[32]Al-Fatihah 7,
[33]Mumammad Asad, The message of the Qur’an, Maidah 3
[34]امسك عليك زوجك واتق الله وتخفي في نفسك
[35] و اذ تقول للذين انعم الله عليه
[36] ظهار.
[37]التي تجادلك زوجها وتشتكي الي ا الله
[38]يجادلونك
[39]Al-Taubah20
Al-Taubah 100,
[40]Al-Ahzap 6, 
[41]Al-Tahrim 1-5.
[42]Al-Mumtahinah 12,
[43]Al-Baqarah 1,Al-Nisa’ 82.
[44]MaulawiSher’Ali, The Holy Qur’an, Arabic text and English translation.
[45]Al-A’raf 157,  
[46]Al-Tahrim 1,
[47] Al-Ahzab 57.
[48] Al-Ahzab 53.
[49] Al-Ahzab 36.
[50]Al-Ahzab 37.
[51]Al-Nisa’ 65.
[52]Al-Mujadalah 1.
[53]Al-Nisa’ 115.
[54]Al-Anfal 5-6.
[55]Al-Ahzab 30-33,
[56]Al-Tahrim 1.
[57]Zaynu, Muhammad Jamil, Arkan al-Islam wa-al-Iman أركانالإسلاموالإيمان,  (Arabic), p. 93.
[58] Abdullah Yusuf Ali, The Holy Qur’an, Al-e’Imran 31.